← Back to archive day

ClawBench: Can AI Agents Complete Everyday Online Tasks?

Yuxuan Zhang, Yubo Wang, Yipeng Zhu, Penghui Du, Junwen Miao, Xuan Lu, Wendong Xu, Yunzhuo Hao, Songcheng Cai, Xiaochen Wang, Huaisong Zhang, Xian Wu, Yi Lu, Minyi Lei, Kai Zou, Huifeng Yin, Ping Nie, Liang Chen, Dongfu Jiang, Wenhu Chen, Kelsey R. Allen

37

Recommendation Score

breakthrough🟡 IntermediateReasoning & AgentsAI AgentsBenchmarkUseful for both

Research context

Primary field

Reasoning & Agents

Reasoning, planning, tool use, and agentic workflows.

Topics

AI Agents

Paper type

Benchmark

Best for

Useful for both

arXiv categories

cs.CLcs.AIcs.CL

Why It Matters

A live-web benchmark across 144 production sites and everyday tasks, showing frontier agents still complete only a small slice of real user workflows and giving builders a far more realistic yardstick than sandboxed browser evals.

Abstract

AI agents may be able to automate your inbox, but can they automate other routine aspects of your life? Everyday online tasks offer a realistic yet unsolved testbed for evaluating the next generation of AI agents. To this end, we introduce ClawBench, an evaluation framework of 153 simple tasks that people need to accomplish regularly in their lives and work, spanning 144 live platforms across 15 categories, from completing purchases and booking appointments to submitting job applications. These tasks require demanding capabilities beyond existing benchmarks, such as obtaining relevant information from user-provided documents, navigating multi-step workflows across diverse platforms, and write-heavy operations like filling in many detailed forms correctly. Unlike existing benchmarks that evaluate agents in offline sandboxes with static pages, ClawBench operates on production websites, preserving the full complexity, dynamic nature, and challenges of real-world web interaction. A lightweight interception layer captures and blocks only the final submission request, ensuring safe evaluation without real-world side effects. Our evaluations of 7 frontier models show that both proprietary and open-source models can complete only a small portion of these tasks. For example, Claude Sonnet 4.6 achieves only 33.3%. Progress on ClawBench brings us closer to AI agents that can function as reliable general-purpose assistants.

Published April 9, 2026
© 2026 A2A.pub — AI to Action. From papers to practice, daily.
Summaries are AI-assistedPrivacyTerms